Taylor Swift to appear in court for cheating on ‘Shake It Off’ lyrics

Singer Taylor Swift, who recently split several records, will likely go on to break with her version of the re-released album ‘Red’ and is due to appear in court soon. The case of dealing with some allegations of plagiarism towards the pop star, before that hit get rid of.

A judge has rejected Taylor Swift’s request to drop the case, saying a jury can find her guilty of copying a song Thankful gon’ toys From 3LW girl group As of 2011. Hit singer get rid of From 2014 look a lot like it, writes BBC. Both songs contain different forms of phrases.Players gonna play” in a “haters gonna hate“.

“Very ordinary”

The judge had previously dismissed the case, saying that the words were too “ordinary” to be copyrighted. U.S. District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald cited as evidence 13 previously released songs containing similar phrases, including Playa Maadi The notorious BIG ON fan dreams From Fleetwood Mac.

In the early 2000s, popular culture was sufficiently imbued with the concepts of players in a the haters to the camel’Thankful… Gonna play‘ From ‘haters gonna hate‘Independent, do not be more creative than’Runners gonna run‘,’Drummers gonna drum‘, From ‘Swimmers gonna swimHe then wrote.

“The concept of parties acting according to their essential nature is not creative at all, and it is banal. In short, the texts in question… are too short, not original and not creative enough to fall under the protection of copyright law.”

Taylor Swift vs. Unbutler Hall

Songbook of the so-called original song Thankful gon’ toysHowever, Sean Hall and Nathan Butler appealed to the governor and the Federal Court of Appeals reversed its decision. To send the case back to that same judge: Fitzgerald. Swift then asked for an expedited ruling — an immediate ruling she says did not infringe copyright — but on Thursday, December 9 the judge refused.

See also  Timothée Chalamet was offered the role of Willy Wonka without an audition (thanks to old childhood videos) | celebrities

“While there are some notable differences between the works, there are also important similarities in word usage and order/structure,” he wrote. He added that “the Court cannot at this point determine that a reasonable juror can find any significant similarity in lyrical formulation, word order or poetic structure between the two works.”

Swift experts made “convincing arguments”, concluded, but this was not enough to keep the case from going to trial.

get rid of?

the number Thankful gon’ toys It was a minor hit by girl group 3LW. Songwriter Sean Hall later wrote and produced songs for artists such as Justin Bieber and Maroon 5, while Nathan Butler worked with the Backstreet Boys and Luther Vandross among others.

the song get rid of It is Taylor Swift’s best-selling single of her career, reaching the highest spot in the US charts and number two in the UK (where it was shocked by number one). All about this bass Van Megan Trainor).

Lawyers for Hall and Butler praised the decision, saying the court “did the right thing.” The pop singer’s upcoming lawsuit has yet to be announced.

Listen to the song Taylor Swift said has transcribed the lyrics from the following:

Sophie Baker

"Award-winning music trailblazer. Gamer. Lifelong alcohol enthusiast. Thinker. Passionate analyst."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *